Difference between accommodating and compromising


23-Feb-2017 01:38

For example, this strategy might be most effective when management is not present to make a decision or when emotions are too high or alcohol use is involved. The best time to negotiate is whenever you can make the opponents offers they may find more attractive than the next-best alternative.The following is a list of appropriate times to negotiate (Robin, 2002): There are many types of negotiators. Julie Gatlin, former graduate student; Allen Wysocki, associate dean and professor; Karl Kepner, emeritus professor; Derek Farnsworth, assistant professor; and Jennifer L.With avoidance, the do-not-engage strategy is one that does not pursue any party’s particular concerns.It is appropriate to use when there is no way for anyone to win or the situation needs a cooling-off period. Consider using negotiation for confronting, compromising, or collaborating.Collaborating involves high to moderate skill levels of parties, clear clarity of both goals, strong status of relationships, win-win attitude toward authority, low concerns for formalities and traditions, and a high self-concept.

Despite our best efforts, we find ourselves in disagreements with other people in all aspects of our lives: at work, in our relationships, in our volunteer activities.These three strategies are engage, do not engage, and negotiate.An engage strategy would be used when the situation allows for confronting, compromising, or collaborating (Robin 2002).Experts agree that a number of conflict resolution styles exist (Bell 2002; Robin 2002; Wertheim 2002). Managers often have an innate preference for only one or two styles.

This document presents five conflict resolution styles, illustrates how to use these conflict resolution styles strategically, and offers advice on the negotiation of conflict resolution.This style is characterized by suppressed emotional levels, a high to low skill level of parties, a moderate clarity of goals of both, a weak status of relationships, a lose-win attitude toward authority, high concerns for formalities, a moderate self-concept, and a high fear of punishment. Avoidance is characterized by a controlled emotional level, a high to low skill levels of parties, a lose-win attitude toward authority, high concern for formalities and traditions, a low self-concept, and a high fear of punishment.